I am under the impression that at the moment ADR is the most commonly used DWF reader/markup software at the moment. Others don’t want to download new software when they have something that would work just as well that they are comfortable with.īecause I am writing for an Engineering program, I was originally focusing my research around ADR. Some people are restricted to using certain software within limits set by their company. "You think their IT will let them download ADR just because you want to send them a DWF? You think they will download and install ADR just to markup a PDF?" When later sharing the files with other people in the process using PDFs would be appropriate and other software’s like bluebeam and adobe would be appropriate. In the design process using ADR would be preferable. **That would be a discussion point in the paper. If the plans are all PDF they can be shared with just about anyone and they should be able to open it with something**. Also this does have to do with people using DWF files Vs. Many others that he coordinates with do not have the same engineering background are not familiar with ADR. My first focus was going to be on the different markup softwaresīluebeam was my original choice for first comparison with ADR because it is the next commonly used program that I have seen co-workers and others in the profession use.Ī close friend of mine who is scheduling for the DFW airport construction has to use bluebeam almost exclusively. use other programs in various situations (I am aware there is no one software for all situations). To clarify the direction of my original questioning, I was looking to compare ADR to other similar plan reviewing software, and why people use it vs. It would be extremely helpful to me to hear people’s initial thoughts on the subject.Īny help with recommending additional resources or literature for information would be very appreciated.įeel Free to send personal messages as well. My experience working with contractors as well as reading forums leads me to believe people outside of the Engineering community with little experience in Autodesk products, tend to be more comfortable with blue beam.
I understand people mostly have preferences particularly based on familiarity with which software they are accustomed to, as well as noticing differences in behavior of the software regarding what they are trying to achieve with it. Personally I find Autodesk more comfortable because of engineering experience with it, but I am lacking extensive experience with both, And am very interested in hearing users opinions. I would love for people to share bits of information on software performance as well as personal preference. Autodesk Design review, preference and practicality. I am a Graduate student trying to reaserch the differences in Bluebeam vs.
0 kommentar(er)
